Outcome Analysis Presentation – Nigeria – Octobre 2016

The analysis shows that the very poor households in MAS and MCS livelihood zone would likely face survival deficits of 2% & 14% respectively, the very poor in MAS, HVM and MCS livelihood zone would likely face a livelihood protection deficit of 10%, 4% & 10% respectively, the poor household also in MAS livelihood zone will likely face a livelihood protection deficit of 2%, while the remaining wealth groups across the LZs are not expected to face any deficit. Households not facing deficits would be able to access food and income to live above the survival and livelihood protection thresholds for the projected period.

Households facing survival deficit would need urgent intervention/support in order to save lives during the deficit period, while households facing livelihood protection deficit would also need support to protect their existing livelihood assets to prevent the use negative coping strategies and falling to survival deficit which is life threatening.